Natural and Organic

Hello dear followers!

I hope you’re well. Let me know how have you been.

I have been away a long time. I think I’m going to be away for far more time honestly.

Lots of things happened lately. Among which a new business in the family. Hoping that it will be the solution for us as nomad travelers.

A new onlineshop is launching soon We’ll be selling unique natural organic beauty products from manufacturers around the world.

I would be very glad to see some more followers on our Facebook and Instagram page @eljemelmarket

Stay safe. Hope to see you soon…

Hello good old friends!

Hey guys,

Just wanna pop in to say “hello“, I miss you so much but can’t get back yet.

How have you been? Anything new? I’d really love to hear from you.

I’ve been ok but rather busy working here and there.

Just a reminder:

If you have a biz, you can follow me on Lgwebmedia for tips on how to manage your business’ social media profile in order to get more exposure or potential customers.

Yes, Social Media is the main medium to increase sales and fans.

What about … #49

This is a little book of an author called Ahmed Didat which died some 20 years ago. I found it funny and interesting, I hope you enjoy it as much as I did. You may read what follows in the next post “who moved the stone”

Since ¬†I ¬†am ¬†commanded ¬†by ¬†my ¬†Prophet, ¬†peace ¬†be ¬†upon ¬†him, ¬†to ¬†seek ¬†knowledge ¬†I ¬†wanted ¬†to learn. ¬†I ¬†said: ¬†“I ¬†agree ¬†with ¬†all ¬†that ¬†you ¬†have ¬†read ¬†to ¬†me, ¬†but ¬†I ¬†have ¬†a ¬†problem ¬†with ¬†your Bible.” ¬†“What ¬†problem ¬†have ¬†you ¬†got?” ¬†he ¬†asked. ¬†I ¬†said: ¬†“Please ¬†open ¬†the ¬†Gospel ¬†of ¬†St. ¬†Luke, chapter 3 verse 23.” This he did. I said: “Please read.” He read:”And ¬†Jesus ¬†himself ¬†began ¬†to ¬†be ¬†about ¬†thirty ¬†years ¬†of ¬†age, ¬†being ¬†(as ¬†was ¬†supposed) ¬†the ¬†son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,” (Luke 3:23) I ¬†drew ¬†the ¬†Reverend’s ¬†attention ¬†to ¬†the ¬†words ¬†– ¬†“(As ¬†was ¬†supposed).” ¬†I ¬†said: ¬†“Do ¬†you ¬†see that ¬†the ¬†words ¬†‘As ¬†was ¬†supposed’ ¬†are ¬†written ¬†within ¬†brackets?” ¬†He ¬†said ¬†that ¬†he ¬†saw ¬†that. ¬†I asked ¬†him: ¬†“Why ¬†are ¬†the ¬†brackets ¬†there?” ¬†He ¬†acknowledged, ¬†“I ¬†don’t ¬†know, ¬†but ¬†I ¬†could ¬†find out ¬†for ¬†you ¬†from ¬†some ¬†Bible ¬†scholars.” ¬†I ¬†admired ¬†his ¬†humility. ¬†Though ¬†I ¬†knew ¬†that ¬†all Supervisors ¬†of ¬†Bible ¬†Houses ¬†in ¬†South ¬†Africa ¬†are ¬†retired ¬†reverends, ¬†it ¬†was ¬†possible ¬†that ¬†this aspect ¬†of ¬†Bible ¬†knowledge ¬†was ¬†beyond ¬†their ¬†sphere. ¬†I ¬†said: ¬†“If ¬†you ¬†do ¬†not ¬†know, ¬†then ¬†let ¬†me tell ¬†you ¬†what ¬†the ¬†brackets ¬†are ¬†doing ¬†there ¬†in ¬†this ¬†verse. ¬†You ¬†do ¬†not ¬†have ¬†to ¬†take ¬†the ¬†trouble of looking for a Bible scholar.” I ¬†explained ¬†that ¬†in ¬†the ¬†“most ¬†ancient” ¬†manuscripts ¬†of ¬†Luke, ¬†the ¬†words ¬†“As ¬†was ¬†supposed” are ¬†not ¬†there. ¬†Your ¬†translators ¬†felt ¬†that ¬†without ¬†this ¬†interpolation ¬†the, ¬†ordinary ¬†Christians, not ¬†well ¬†grounded ¬†in ¬†faith, ¬†might ¬†slip ¬†and ¬†fall ¬†into ¬†the ¬†error ¬†of ¬†believing ¬†that ¬†Joseph ¬†the Carpenter ¬†was ¬†the ¬†actual ¬†physical ¬†father ¬†of ¬†Jesus. ¬†So ¬†they ¬†took ¬†the ¬†precaution ¬†of ¬†adding their ¬†own ¬†comment ¬†in ¬†brackets ¬†to ¬†avoid ¬†any ¬†misunderstanding. ¬†I ¬†said: ¬†“I ¬†am ¬†not ¬†trying ¬†to find ¬†fault ¬†with ¬†your ¬†system ¬†of ¬†adding ¬†words ¬†in ¬†brackets ¬†to ¬†assist ¬†the ¬†reader, ¬†but ¬†what intrigues ¬†me ¬†is ¬†that ¬†in ¬†all ¬†translations ¬†of ¬†the ¬†Bible ¬†in ¬†the ¬†African ¬†and ¬†Eastern ¬†languages ¬†you have ¬†retained ¬†the ¬†words ¬†“as ¬†was ¬†supposed” ¬†but ¬†have ¬†removed ¬†the ¬†brackets! ¬†Couldn’t ¬†the nations ¬†of ¬†the ¬†Earth ¬†besides ¬†the ¬†English ¬†understand ¬†the ¬†meaning ¬†and ¬†purpose ¬†of ¬†the brackets? What ¬†is ¬†wrong ¬†with ¬†the ¬†Afrikaner? ¬†Why ¬†have ¬†you ¬†eliminated ¬†the ¬†brackets ¬†from ¬†the ¬†Afrikaans Bible? ¬†The ¬†Supervisor ¬†protested: ¬†“I ¬†didn’t ¬†do ¬†it.” ¬†I ¬†said: ¬†“I ¬†know ¬†that ¬†you ¬†personally ¬†did ¬†not do ¬†it ¬†but ¬†why ¬†have ¬†the ¬†Bible ¬†Society ¬†that ¬†you ¬†represent ¬†and ¬†your ¬†Bible ¬†scholars ¬†been ¬†playing with ¬†the ¬†‘Word ¬†of ¬†God?’ ¬†If ¬†God ¬†Almighty ¬†did ¬†not ¬†see ¬†fit ¬†to ¬†preserve ¬†Luke ¬†from ¬†error ¬†what right ¬†has ¬†anybody ¬†to ¬†add ¬†to ¬†or ¬†delete ¬†from ¬†words ¬†in ¬†the ¬†‘Book ¬†of ¬†God?’ ¬†What ¬†right ¬†have ¬†you to manufacture ‘God’s Words?’ Interpolations The ¬†translator’s ¬†own ¬†addition ¬†of ¬†words ¬†in ¬†brackets ¬†can ¬†easily ¬†be ¬†put ¬†into ¬†the ¬†mouth ¬†of ¬†St. Luke ¬†by ¬†merely ¬†removing ¬†the ¬†brackets, ¬†and ¬†by ¬†implication, ¬†if ¬†Luke ¬†was ¬†inspired ¬†by ¬†God ¬†to write ¬†what ¬†he ¬†did, ¬†then ¬†the ¬†interpolations ¬†automatically ¬†become ¬†the ¬†Word ¬†of ¬†God, ¬†which really ¬†is ¬†not ¬†the ¬†case. ¬†(More ¬†will ¬†be ¬†said ¬†on ¬†this ¬†subject ¬†in ¬†the ¬†forthcoming ¬†publication ¬†Is ¬†the Bible ¬†God’s ¬†Word?) ¬†I ¬†concluded ¬†my ¬†explanation ¬†with ¬†the ¬†words ¬†– ¬†‘Your ¬†theologians ¬†of ¬†the day ¬†have ¬†succeeded ¬†where ¬†the ¬†alchemists ¬†of ¬†yore ¬†failed ¬†– ¬†of ¬†turning ¬†baser ¬†metal ¬†into ¬†shining gold.'” The English Language At ¬†this ¬†stage ¬†the ¬†Reverend ¬†introduced ¬†irrelevancies ¬†into ¬†the ¬†discussion ¬†and ¬†the ¬†subject changed. ¬†He ¬†made ¬†some ¬†claims ¬†which ¬†made ¬†me ¬†say: ¬†“You ¬†see, ¬†sir, ¬†you ¬†English ¬†people ¬†do not ¬†know ¬†your ¬†own ¬†language.” ¬†(With ¬†apologies ¬†to ¬†my ¬†readers ¬†whose ¬†mother ¬†tongue ¬†is English). ¬†He ¬†quickly ¬†retorted: ¬†“You ¬†mean ¬†to ¬†say ¬†that ¬†you ¬†know ¬†my ¬†language ¬†better ¬†than ¬†I do?” ¬†I ¬†said: ¬†“It ¬†would ¬†be ¬†presumptuous ¬†on ¬†my ¬†part ¬†to ¬†tell ¬†– ¬†an ¬†Englishman ¬†– ¬†that ¬†I understand ¬†your ¬†language ¬†better ¬†than ¬†you ¬†do.” ¬†“Then ¬†what ¬†do ¬†you ¬†mean ¬†that ¬†we ¬†English people ¬†do ¬†not ¬†know ¬†our ¬†own ¬†language?” ¬†he ¬†demanded. ¬†I ¬†said ¬†again: ¬†“You ¬†see, ¬†sir, ¬†you ¬†read your ¬†Holy ¬†Scripture ¬†in ¬†your ¬†mother ¬†tongue, ¬†like ¬†every ¬†Christian ¬†belonging ¬†to ¬†a ¬†thousand different ¬†language ¬†groups, ¬†and ¬†yet ¬†each ¬†and ¬†every ¬†Christian ¬†language ¬†group ¬†understands the facts, ¬†opposite ¬†to what he is reading.” “What are you referring to?” he asked. A Ghost I ¬†continued: ¬†“Do ¬†you ¬†remember ¬†the ¬†occasion ¬†when ¬†Jesus ¬†returned ¬†to ¬†that ¬†upper ¬†room ¬†after his ¬†alleged ¬†crucifixion: ¬†‘And ¬†saith ¬†unto ¬†them, ¬†(his ¬†disciples), ¬†‘Peace ¬†be ¬†unto ¬†you” ¬†(Luke 24:36), ¬†and ¬†his ¬†disciples ¬†were ¬†terrified ¬†on ¬†recognizing ¬†him?” ¬†He ¬†answered ¬†that ¬†he remembered ¬†that ¬†incident. ¬†I ¬†inquired: ¬†“Why ¬†should ¬†they ¬†be ¬†terrified?” ¬†When ¬†one ¬†recognizes one’s ¬†long-lost ¬†friend ¬†or ¬†one’s ¬†beloved, ¬†the ¬†natural ¬†reaction ¬†is ¬†to ¬†feel ¬†overjoyed, ¬†elated ¬†and one ¬†wants ¬†to ¬†embrace ¬†and ¬†kiss ¬†the ¬†hands ¬†and ¬†feet ¬†of ¬†the ¬†beloved. ¬†Why ¬†did ¬†they ¬†get terrified?” ¬†The ¬†Reverend ¬†replied ¬†that ¬†they ¬†(the ¬†disciples) ¬†thought ¬†that ¬†they ¬†were ¬†seeing ¬†a ghost.” ¬†I ¬†asked: ¬†“Did ¬†Jesus ¬†look ¬†like ¬†a ¬†ghost?” ¬†He ¬†said: ¬†“No.” ¬†“Then ¬†why ¬†did ¬†they ¬†think ¬†that they ¬†were ¬†seeing ¬†a ¬†ghost ¬†when ¬†he ¬†did ¬†not ¬†look ¬†like ¬†a ¬†ghost?” ¬†I ¬†queried. ¬†The ¬†Reverend ¬†was clearly puzzled. I said: “Please allow me to explain.” Disciples Not Eye Witnesses “You ¬†see, ¬†sir, ¬†the ¬†disciples ¬†of ¬†Jesus ¬†were ¬†not ¬†eye-witnesses ¬†or ¬†ear-witnesses ¬†to ¬†the ¬†actual happenings ¬†of ¬†the ¬†previous ¬†three ¬†days, ¬†as ¬†vouched ¬†for ¬†by ¬†St. ¬†Mark ¬†who ¬†says ¬†that ¬†at ¬†the most ¬†critical ¬†juncture ¬†in ¬†the ¬†life ¬†of ¬†Jesus: ¬†“they ¬†all ¬†forsook ¬†him ¬†and ¬†fled.” ¬†(Mark ¬†14:50). ¬†All the ¬†knowledge ¬†of ¬†the ¬†disciples ¬†regarding ¬†their ¬†Master ¬†was ¬†from ¬†hearsay. ¬†They ¬†had ¬†heard that ¬†their ¬†master ¬†was ¬†hanged ¬†on ¬†the ¬†Cross; ¬†they ¬†had ¬†heard ¬†that ¬†he ¬†had ¬†given ¬†up ¬†the ¬†Ghost; they ¬†had ¬†heard ¬†that ¬†he ¬†was ¬†dead ¬†and ¬†buried ¬†for ¬†three ¬†days. ¬†If ¬†one ¬†is ¬†confronted ¬†by ¬†a ¬†person with ¬†such ¬†a ¬†reputation ¬†then ¬†the ¬†conclusion ¬†is ¬†inescapable; ¬†they ¬†must ¬†be ¬†seeing ¬†a ¬†ghost. Little wonder these ten brave men were petrified.” “To ¬†disabuse ¬†their ¬†minds ¬†from ¬†the ¬†fear ¬†that ¬†gripped ¬†them, ¬†Jesus ¬†reasoned ¬†with ¬†them. ¬†He said: ¬†‘Behold ¬†my ¬†hands ¬†and ¬†my ¬†feet, ¬†that ¬†it ¬†is ¬†I ¬†myself’ ¬†To ¬†put ¬†it ¬†in ¬†colloquial ¬†English, ¬†this ¬†is how ¬†he ¬†told ¬†them: ¬†‘What ¬†is ¬†wrong ¬†with ¬†you ¬†fellows, ¬†can’t ¬†you ¬†see ¬†that ¬†I ¬†am ¬†the ¬†same person ¬†– ¬†who ¬†walked ¬†and ¬†talked ¬†with ¬†you, ¬†broke ¬†bread ¬†with ¬†you ¬†– ¬†flesh ¬†and ¬†blood ¬†in ¬†all respects.’ Why ¬†do ¬†doubts ¬†enter ¬†your ¬†minds? ¬†‘Handle ¬†me ¬†and ¬†see, ¬†for ¬†a ¬†spirit ¬†has ¬†no ¬†flesh ¬†and ¬†bones ¬†as you ¬†see ¬†me ¬†have.’ ¬†(Luke ¬†24:39). ¬†In ¬†other ¬†words ¬†he ¬†is ¬†telling ¬†them: ¬†‘If ¬†I ¬†have ¬†flesh ¬†and bones, ¬†then ¬†I ¬†am ¬†not ¬†a ¬†ghost, ¬†not ¬†a ¬†spook ¬†and ¬†not ¬†a ¬†spirit!'” ¬†“Is ¬†that ¬†right?” ¬†I ¬†asked. ¬†“Yes,” he ¬†replied. ¬†I ¬†continued ¬†that, ¬†Jesus ¬†is ¬†telling ¬†them, ¬†as ¬†recorded ¬†in ¬†this ¬†verse, ¬†in ¬†basic ¬†English, that ¬†what ¬†the ¬†disciples ¬†were ¬†asked ¬†to ¬†“handle ¬†and ¬†see” ¬†was ¬†not ¬†a ¬†translated ¬†body, ¬†not ¬†a metamorphosed ¬†body ¬†and ¬†not ¬†a ¬†resurrected ¬†body, ¬†because ¬†a ¬†resurrected ¬†body ¬†is ¬†a spiritualised ¬†body. ¬†He ¬†is ¬†telling ¬†them ¬†in ¬†the ¬†clearest ¬†language ¬†humanly ¬†possible ¬†that ¬†he ¬†is not ¬†what ¬†they ¬†were ¬†thinking. ¬†They ¬†were ¬†thinking ¬†that ¬†he ¬†was ¬†a ¬†spirit, ¬†a ¬†resurrected ¬†body, one having been brought back from the dead. He is most emphatic that ¬†he is not!” Spiritualization “But ¬†how ¬†can ¬†you ¬†be ¬†so ¬†sure ¬†that ¬†the ¬†resurrected ¬†body ¬†cannot ¬†materialize ¬†physically ¬†as Jesus ¬†had ¬†obviously ¬†done?” ¬†murmured ¬†the ¬†Reverend. ¬†I ¬†replied: ¬†“Because ¬†Jesus ¬†had ¬†himself pronounced ¬†that ¬†the ¬†resurrected ¬†bodies ¬†get ¬†spiritualised.” ¬†When ¬†did ¬†he ¬†say ¬†any ¬†such ¬†thing?”inquired ¬†the ¬†Reverend. ¬†I ¬†answered: ¬†“Do ¬†you ¬†remember ¬†the ¬†incident ¬†as ¬†recorded ¬†in ¬†the Gospel ¬†of ¬†St. ¬†Luke, ¬†chapter ¬†20, ¬†where ¬†the ¬†learned ¬†men ¬†of ¬†the ¬†Jews- ¬†“the ¬†chief ¬†priests ¬†and the ¬†scribes ¬†with ¬†the ¬†elders”- ¬†had ¬†come ¬†to ¬†him ¬†with ¬†a ¬†number ¬†of ¬†posers, ¬†and ¬†among ¬†them was ¬†one ¬†about ¬†a ¬†Jewess ¬†who ¬†had ¬†seven ¬†husbands ¬†in ¬†turn, ¬†one ¬†after ¬†another ¬†according ¬†to ¬†a Jewish ¬†custom, ¬†and ¬†in ¬†time ¬†all ¬†seven ¬†husbands ¬†and ¬†the ¬†woman ¬†too ¬†died?” ¬†The ¬†Reverend said ¬†that ¬†he ¬†did ¬†remember ¬†the ¬†occasion. ¬†I ¬†continued: ¬†“The ¬†trap ¬†that ¬†the ¬†religious ¬†hierarchy was ¬†trying ¬†to ¬†spring ¬†on ¬†him ¬†was; ¬†which ¬†one ¬†of ¬†the ¬†seven ¬†husbands ¬†was ¬†going ¬†to ¬†possess ¬†the woman ¬†on ¬†the ¬†‘Other ¬†side’- ¬†at ¬†the ¬†resurrection?- ¬†since ¬†they ¬†reasoned ¬†with ¬†Jesus ¬†that ¬†the seven brothers ¬†had her. There ¬†was ¬†no ¬†problem ¬†while ¬†they ¬†fulfilled ¬†their ¬†obligation ¬†of ¬†trying ¬†to ¬†give ¬†her ¬†a ¬†child, because ¬†they ¬†had ¬†possessed ¬†her ¬†one ¬†by ¬†one ¬†in ¬†turn, ¬†and ¬†it ¬†was ¬†after ¬†the ¬†death ¬†of ¬†one ¬†that the ¬†other ¬†had ¬†taken ¬†her ¬†to ¬†wife. ¬†But ¬†since ¬†at ¬†the ¬†resurrection ¬†all ¬†seven ¬†will ¬†be ¬†brought ¬†to ¬†life simultaneously, ¬†there ¬†will ¬†be ¬†strife ¬†in ¬†heaven ¬†because ¬†all ¬†seven ¬†would ¬†want ¬†to ¬†get ¬†at ¬†her ¬†at the same time, specially if they had pleasure with her.” “Jesus ¬†debunked ¬†their ¬†false ¬†notion ¬†of ¬†the ¬†resurrection, ¬†by ¬†saying ¬†that ¬†at ¬†the ¬†resurrection: ‘neither ¬†shall ¬†they ¬†die ¬†any ¬†more’ ¬†(Luke ¬†20:36) ¬†meaning ¬†that ¬†the ¬†resurrected ¬†persons ¬†will ¬†be Immortalised. ¬†They ¬†will ¬†not ¬†be ¬†subject ¬†to ¬†death ¬†any ¬†more, ¬†no ¬†more ¬†hanger ¬†or ¬†thirst, ¬†no more ¬†fatigue. ¬†In ¬†short, ¬†all ¬†the ¬†instruments ¬†of ¬†death ¬†will ¬†be ¬†powerless ¬†against ¬†the resurrected ¬†body. ¬†Jesus ¬†continues ¬†to ¬†explain: ¬†‘for ¬†they ¬†(the ¬†resurrected ¬†bodies) ¬†are ¬†equal unto ¬†the ¬†angles,’ ¬†that ¬†is, ¬†that ¬†they ¬†will ¬†be ¬†Angelised ¬†– ¬†spiritualised, ¬†that ¬†they ¬†will ¬†become spirit-creatures, ¬†i.e. ¬†Spirits;’and ¬†the ¬†children ¬†of ¬†God, ¬†for ¬†such ¬†are ¬†the ¬†children ¬†of ¬†the resurrection.” (Luke 20:36). Jesus Not Spiritualised I ¬†was ¬†taken ¬†off ¬†from ¬†the ¬†theme ¬†I ¬†was ¬†expounding ¬†two ¬†paragraphs ¬†above ¬†by ¬†the ¬†Reverend with ¬†the ¬†challenge: ¬†“But ¬†how ¬†can ¬†you ¬†be ¬†so ¬†sure..?” ¬†To ¬†continue ¬†from ¬†where ¬†I ¬†had ¬†deviated above ¬†– ¬†He ¬†is ¬†Not ¬†what ¬†they ¬†were ¬†thinking, ¬†that ¬†he ¬†was ¬†not ¬†a ¬†Spirit, ¬†not ¬†a ¬†Ghost, ¬†not ¬†a Spook. ¬†To ¬†assure ¬†them ¬†further ¬†after ¬†having ¬†offered ¬†his ¬†hands ¬†and ¬†feet ¬†for ¬†inspection ¬†and verification ¬†that ¬†his ¬†was ¬†a ¬†material, ¬†physical ¬†body, ¬†and ¬†that ¬†all ¬†their ¬†bewilderment ¬†and disbelief ¬†was ¬†unjustified, ¬†he ¬†asked ¬†his ¬†disciples: ¬†“Have ¬†you ¬†here ¬†any ¬†meat?” ¬†(Meaning something ¬†to ¬†eat). ¬†“And ¬†they ¬†gave ¬†him ¬†a ¬†piece ¬†of ¬†broiled ¬†fish ¬†and ¬†of ¬†a ¬†honeycomb, ¬†and ¬†he took it, and did eat before them.” (Luke 24:41-43) A Drama? What ¬†was ¬†Jesus ¬†trying ¬†to ¬†prove ¬†by ¬†all ¬†his ¬†demonstrations ¬†of ¬†wanting ¬†his ¬†hands ¬†and ¬†feet ¬†to be ¬†handled ¬†and ¬†chewing ¬†and ¬†masticating ¬†broiled ¬†fish ¬†and ¬†honeycomb? ¬†Was ¬†all ¬†this ¬†a pretense, ¬†make-belief, ¬†an ¬†act ¬†or ¬†drama? ¬†“No!” ¬†Said ¬†Schleliermacher ¬†in ¬†1819, ¬†a ¬†hundred years ¬†before ¬†I ¬†was ¬†born. ¬†Albert ¬†Schweizer ¬†records ¬†him ¬†saying: ¬†“If ¬†Christ ¬†had ¬†only ¬†eaten ¬†to show ¬†that ¬†he ¬†could ¬†eat, ¬†while ¬†he ¬†really ¬†had ¬†no ¬†need ¬†of ¬†nourishment, ¬†if ¬†would ¬†have ¬†been ¬†a pretense, something docetic.”( ¬†In Quest of the Historical Jesus, ¬†page 64). I ¬†had ¬†not ¬†know ¬†of ¬†Schleliermacher ¬†and ¬†other ¬†Christian ¬†scholars ¬†who ¬†over ¬†a ¬†hundred ¬†years ago ¬†doubted ¬†the ¬†death ¬†of ¬†Jesus ¬†on ¬†the ¬†cross ¬†as ¬†recorded ¬†by ¬†Albert ¬†Schweizer, ¬†when ¬†I ¬†was discussing this subject with the head of the Bible Society. No Resurrection “What ¬†is ¬†wrong ¬†with ¬†you ¬†(Christian) ¬†folk?” ¬†Jesus ¬†is ¬†telling ¬†you ¬†in ¬†the ¬†most ¬†unambiguous language ¬†that ¬†he ¬†is ¬†not ¬†a ¬†spirit ¬†– ¬†not ¬†spiritualised, ¬†not ¬†a ¬†resurrected ¬†person, ¬†and ¬†yet ¬†the whole ¬†Christian ¬†world ¬†believes ¬†that ¬†he ¬†was ¬†resurrected, ¬†i.e. ¬†spiritualised. ¬†Who ¬†is ¬†lying, ¬†you or ¬†him? ¬†How ¬†is ¬†it ¬†possible ¬†that ¬†you, ¬†each ¬†and ¬†every ¬†Christian, ¬†are ¬†reading ¬†your ¬†Bible ¬†in ¬†your own ¬†mother ¬†tongue ¬†and ¬†yet ¬†each ¬†and ¬†every ¬†groups ¬†is ¬†made ¬†to ¬†understand ¬†the ¬†exact opposite ¬†of ¬†what ¬†they ¬†are ¬†reading? ¬†If ¬†you ¬†read ¬†the ¬†Bible, ¬†say, ¬†in ¬†Hebrew, ¬†and ¬†pleaded ¬†that you ¬†did ¬†not ¬†understand ¬†what ¬†you ¬†were ¬†reading, ¬†I ¬†can ¬†appreciate ¬†this ¬†fact. ¬†If ¬†you ¬†read ¬†it ¬†in Greek ¬†and ¬†pleaded ¬†that ¬†you ¬†did ¬†not ¬†really ¬†understand ¬†the ¬†implications ¬†of ¬†what ¬†was ¬†written; I ¬†can ¬†appreciate ¬†this ¬†fact ¬†also. ¬†But ¬†the ¬†anomaly ¬†is ¬†that ¬†you ¬†are ¬†reading ¬†the ¬†Book, ¬†each ¬†and every ¬†one, ¬†in ¬†his ¬†own ¬†mother ¬†tongue, ¬†and ¬†are ¬†trained ¬†to ¬†understand ¬†the ¬†opposite ¬†of ¬†what ¬†is written. ¬†How ¬†have ¬†you ¬†been ¬†brainwashed, ¬†or ¬†rather, ¬†how ¬†have ¬†you ¬†been ¬†“Programmed,” ¬†as the Americans would put it? “Please ¬†tell ¬†me ¬†as ¬†to ¬†who ¬†is ¬†lying? ¬†Is ¬†it ¬†Jesus ¬†or ¬†a ¬†thousand ¬†million ¬†Christians ¬†of ¬†the ¬†world? Jesus ¬†says: ¬†“No!” ¬†to ¬†his ¬†being ¬†resurrected, ¬†and ¬†all ¬†of ¬†you ¬†say: ¬†“Yes!” ¬†Whom ¬†are ¬†we ¬†Muslims to ¬†believe, ¬†Jesus ¬†or ¬†his ¬†so ¬†called ¬†disciples? ¬†We ¬†Muslims ¬†would ¬†rather ¬†believe ¬†the ¬†Master. ¬†Did he not say: “The disciple is not greater than the Master.”? (Matthew 10:24) This ¬†was ¬†more ¬†than ¬†the ¬†Reverend ¬†had ¬†bargained ¬†for. ¬†He ¬†politely ¬†excused ¬†himself ¬†by ¬†saying that ¬†as ¬†he ¬†had ¬†to ¬†get ¬†ready ¬†to ¬†close ¬†his ¬†office, ¬†he ¬†would ¬†look ¬†forward ¬†to ¬†meeting ¬†me ¬†again. This was sheer evasive politeness! With ¬†the ¬†Bible ¬†Society, ¬†I ¬†won ¬†the ¬†debate ¬†but ¬†lost ¬†the ¬†discount! ¬†No ¬†more ¬†discount ¬†for ¬†me from ¬†the ¬†Bible ¬†Society. ¬†But ¬†let ¬†my ¬†loss ¬†be ¬†your ¬†gain. ¬†If ¬†you ¬†dear ¬†reader, ¬†can ¬†remove ¬†a ¬†few cobwebs from your thinking on the subject of the ¬†Crucifixion, I will be amply rewarded. Now here are the verses discussed put together : “..Jesus ¬†himself ¬†stood ¬†in ¬†their ¬†midst, ¬†and ¬†said ¬†unto ¬†them, ¬†Peace ¬†be ¬†unto ¬†you…But ¬†they ¬†were terrified, ¬†and ¬†supposing ¬†that ¬†they ¬†were ¬†seeing ¬†a ¬†spirit… ¬†And ¬†he ¬†said ¬†unto ¬†them,.. ¬†‘Behold my ¬†hands ¬†and ¬†my ¬†feet, ¬†that ¬†it ¬†is ¬†I ¬†myself: ¬†handle ¬†me ¬†and ¬†see; ¬†for ¬†a ¬†spirit ¬†has ¬†no ¬†flesh ¬†and bones, ¬†as ¬†you ¬†see ¬†me ¬†have’… ¬†And ¬†showed ¬†them ¬†his ¬†hands ¬†and ¬†feet… ¬†And ¬†while ¬†they ¬†yet believed ¬†not ¬†for ¬†joy ¬†and ¬†wondered, ¬†he ¬†said ¬†unto ¬†them, ¬†‘Have ¬†ye ¬†here ¬†any ¬†meat?’.. ¬†And ¬†they gave ¬†him ¬†a ¬†piece ¬†of ¬†broiled ¬†fish, ¬†and ¬†of ¬†a ¬†honeycomb… ¬†And ¬†he ¬†took ¬†it, ¬†and ¬†did ¬†eat ¬†before them.” (Luke 24:36-43)

What about … #47

Mary 19:

16. And mention in the Scripture Mary, when she withdrew from her people to an eastern location.

17. She screened herself away from them, and We sent to her Our spirit, and He appeared to her as an immaculate human.

18.¬†She said, ‚ÄúI take refuge from you in the Most Merciful, should you be righteous.‚ÄĚ

19.¬†He said, ‚ÄúI am only the messenger of your Lord, to give you the gift of a pure son.‚ÄĚ

20.¬†She said, ‚ÄúHow can I have a son, when no man has touched me, and I was never unchaste?‚ÄĚ

21.¬†He said, ‚ÄúThus said your Lord, `It is easy for Me, and We will make him a sign for humanity, and a mercy from Us. It is a matter already decided.’‚Äú

22. So she carried him, and secluded herself with him in a remote place.

23.¬†The labor-pains came upon her, by the trunk of a palm-tree. She said, ‚ÄúI wish I had died before this, and been completely forgotten.‚ÄĚ

24. Whereupon he called her from beneath her: “Do not worry; your Lord has placed a stream beneath you.

25.¬†And shake the trunk of the palm-tree towards you, and it will drop ripe dates by you.‚ÄĚ

26.¬†‚ÄúSo eat, and drink, and be consoled. And if you see any human, say, ‚ÄėI have vowed a fast to the Most Gracious, so I will not speak to any human today.’‚Äú

27. Then she came to her people, carrying him. They said, “O Mary, you have done something terrible.

28.¬†O sister of Aaron, your father was not an evil man, and your mother was not a whore.‚ÄĚ

29.¬†So she pointed to him. They said, ‚ÄúHow can we speak to an infant in the crib?‚ÄĚ

30. He said, “I am the servant of God. He has given me the Scripture, and made me a prophet.

31. And has made me blessed wherever I may be; and has enjoined on me prayer and charity, so long as I live.

32. And kind to my mother, and He did not make me a disobedient rebel.

33.¬†So Peace is upon me the day I was born, and the day I die, and the Day I get resurrected alive.‚ÄĚ

34.¬†That is Jesus son of Mary‚ÄĒthe Word of truth about which they doubt.

35.¬†It is not for God to have a child‚ÄĒglory be to Him. To have anything done, He says to it, ‚ÄúBe,‚ÄĚ and it becomes.

36.¬†‚ÄúGod is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. That is a straight path.‚ÄĚ

37. But the various factions differed among themselves. So woe to those who disbelieve from the scene of a tremendous Day.

38. Listen to them and watch for them the Day they come to Us. But the wrongdoers today are completely lost.

39. And warn them of the Day of Regret, when the matter will be concluded. Yet they are heedless, and they do not believe.

40. It is We who will inherit the earth and everyone on it, and to Us they will be returned.

Customer’s hotel review

I’m wondering…. Do you read the customer’s review before booking a room in a hotel?

To tell you the truth, it is not very often that I do. Living on the roads, you get used to what you find. But on some occasions, an instinct comes to tell you “see what the people say about it”.

And that’s what I did yesterday. I was going to book a room in a cheap place (which I won’t be naming here but it is in Belgium) when i found that I had to pay for the towels and sheets. But how much do they ask for it? Time to check the hotel’s comments, who knows, perhaps someone said the fee. ūüėČ be sure to read all of them and if you had a good laugh as I did, please leave a comment.

Comment 1

We could not enjoy the rented property because it was already rented by another family. Fortunately neighbors were able to accommodate us in a small cottage. We visited the house originally rented and the bathroom is in the room, there is no door to the toilet and the work is not finished (dangerous for children)

Comment 2

The owner was not there and did not welcome us. The room has no door and the only shower in the house was in the room. There are holes on the ceiling and on the floor as well as a cat who does not hesitate to search our things at night (it was not indicated on the ad and I am allergic). None of the features listed on the ad have been verified.

Comment 3

The host was very helpful and gave us good information on how to reach the house. The rooms were big and the bed was comfortable. The bathroom was equipped and soap/towels were provided to the visitors.

· The house address was special and some signs to direct visitors by car would have been helpful. The kitchen could have used lighting as it was dark at night. The bathroom and the main room were combined which was a shame !

Comment 4

Awesome location, you can find everything you need in this big house. Kind owner, always trying to pleased guests need.

Shared house with no privacy, missing door and ceilings, still a work in progress I guess. The only toilet and shower are in the main room with nothing to separate them from bed side, 2nd toilet out of order most of the time.

Comment 5

A bumpy unimproved road to the cottage in a forest area. A lot of garbage outside the cottage. Nobody there. Phone call. Key outside somewhere. Dark inside, hardly any bulbs. Three sleeping rooms, each having blankets as doors. Blankets also before the windows. All cupboards filled with personal belongings; apparently somehow someone lives here and leaves it then for rental purposes. Just one closet upstairs, also in the open air. Floors of the sleeping rooms are being renovated, with missing boards: mind your steps. Someone arrived during the night, heard him / her snore. I am used to sleep everywhere; but this time I had a creepy feeling.

Comment 6
This establishment is almost impossible to reach. The address is very complicated and the city name is wrong. In addition, the owner was not helpful. When we reached the place at 10:30 PM everything was closed and after a phone call we got an answering machine although we specified an arrival time in between 10 and 11 PM. Therefore we had no access to the room. The following day we called again the owner. She lied telling us that she was waiting for us very lately and that she sent SMS. Of course we got nothing. We are asking for a full refund and we noticed similar bad experiences within the comments of the website. Altogether this is everything but serious.

Comment 7
1) The property was difficult to find. The road leading to it was narrow, muddy (especially after a rainy day) and not well signposted. The front of the property was a tip.
2) The living room looks really nice but I think the owner was more concerned about collecting trinkets than actually making the place safe and fit for purpose.
3) There are no doors to the rooms for privacy. Just curtains hanging by the door frames.
4) There is a gap on the floor as you enter one of the rooms and my wife’s foot got caught. Obviously you tend to look into the room as you enter, and a gap on the floor is the last thing you expect.
5) The floor boards outside the property have not really been brushed for a long time and has accumulated gunk which made it very slippery on a rainy day. My 10 yr old son slipped and hurt his back. He was already aware it was slippery, but still slipped because it was just too slippery.
6) The door to the side of the property was not locked and the owner did not leave the key to lock that door. We felt very vulnerable.
7) There is no separate toilet/shower. However, one room had an open plan toilet/ shower. Remember that there are no doors. It means somebody can just go into your room, do his business and leave a stinking smell in your room all the time while you’re in bed. You can even play pass-the-tissue if you want.
8) The worst part of all was when we had a power cut. Yes, an electricity power cut. I can see that other houses have electricity so it’s just the house we are in that has no power. I texted the owner and told her about the power cut. She did not even address that problem. No lights and no heating. It was very cold. The house was not properly insulated.
9) The owner phoned that there were other people coming to stay for the night. We are in the middle of nowhere. Side door unlocked. No doors to the rooms. No lights. And strangers will arrive in the middle of the night! It was a nightmare.

Come on! What’s this place? Be sure to read the reviews before booking somewhere you’ve never been.